SPACE SYNTAX AND VOLUNTEERED GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION FOR UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PLANNING AND DESIGN 

      Evidence from the Netherlands, Zernike Campus Groningen

大学校园规划和设计中的空间语法和自发地理信息——证据来自荷兰格罗宁根泽尼克校区

ISABELLE SOARES ;CLAUDIA YAMU;GERD WEITKAMP 

University of Groningen ;University of Groningen;University of Groningen

格罗宁根大学 ；格罗宁根大学；格罗宁根大学

Keywords：University campus design, wellbeing, volunteered geographic information (VGI), space 

关键词:大学校园设计，幸福感，志愿地理信息(VGI)，空间

本文来自于第十二届空间句法北京会议，文件夹”Campus Environment”,序号134

论文下载链接：

http://www.12sssbeijing.com/proceedings/

【浙江工业大学理论课作业】

ABSTRACT

摘要

The social, physical and psychological dimensions of wellbeing for public spaces between buildings and classrooms in university campus areas

represent, for its users, multiple assemblages of material, cultural, emotional and social aspects (Atkinson, Fuller & Painter, 2012).

大学校园区域建筑和教室之间的公共空间的社会、生理和心理健康维度为用户呈现了材料、文化、情感和社会方面的多种组合(Atkinson, Fuller & Painter, 2012)。

There are a number of complexities that characterise the bonds between people-people and people-environment interactions, which are represented here by the possibilities of socialisation, sense of safety, stress relief and sense of belonging.

人与人之间以及人与人与环境之间的互动有许多复杂的特征，在这里表现为社会化、安全感、缓解压力和归属感的可能性。

Such possibilities should be considered in the design of the university campus public spaces, not only in cause of the continuous technological advancement, internationalisation and competitiveness, but also in order to achieve a healthy balance between work and recreational spaces.

在大学校园公共空间的设计中，不仅要考虑到科技的不断进步、国际化和竞争力，更要在工作空间和休闲空间之间实现健康的平衡。

A variety of space syntax theories and methods have indicated with success the relationship between spatial configuration and pedestrian movement in diverse urban structures (Hillier et al., 1993; Hillier, Yang, & Turner, 2012; Sharmin & Kamruzzaman, 2018).

各种空间句法理论和方法成功地指出了不同城市结构中空间形态与行人运动之间的关系(Hillier et al.，1993;Yang, Hillier， & Turner, 2012;Sharmin & Kamruzzaman, 2018)。

Complementary to space syntax, VGI (Volunteered Geographic Information) participatory methods have helped researchers capture people’s perceptions of the environment representing it as geo-based information. Herein, a mixed-method approach involving space syntax analysis and VGI data collection through face-to-face interviews can be used as evidence for future campus planning and design.

作为空间语法的补充，VGI(自发地理信息)参与式方法帮助研究人员捕捉人们对环境的感知，并将其作为基于地理的信息表示出来。在此，空间句法分析和面对面访谈收集VGI数据的混合方法可以作为未来校园规划设计的依据。 

This experimental mixed-method was then applied to the case of Zernike Campus Groningen, in the Netherlands. The results obtained have shown that despite the fact that space syntax is very effective in forecasting pedestrian movement, the collected VGI data has the advantage of representing people’s perceptions and experiences of public spaces between buildings and classrooms.

这种实验混合方法随后被应用到荷兰格罗宁根泽尼克校区的案例中。研究结果显示，尽管空间句法在预测行人运动方面非常有效，但所收集的VGI数据具有代表人们对建筑和教室之间的公共空间的感知和体验的优势。

The results obtained in this paper found that there is a significantly low spatial correlation between pedestrian movement and the VGI data that the interviewees regarded as possible places of socialisation, sense of safety, stress relief and sense of belonging.

本文的研究结果发现，行人运动与受访者认为可能具有社交、安全感、缓解压力和归属感的VGI数据之间的空间相关性显著较低。

The misfits in the correlation analysis contribute to our on-going investigation opportunities for critical reflection and further research; this includes the experimentation of another space syntax measures, modelling internal corridors in the campus and potential ways to collect VGI data.

相关性分析中的不适应有助于我们进行批判性反思和进一步研究的调查机会;这包括另一种空间语法措施的实验、校园内部走廊的建模以及收集VGI数据的潜在方法。

REFERENCES

参考文献

Al_Sayed, K., Turner, A. and Hanna, S., 2012, January. Generative structures in cities.

In Proceedings of the 8th International Space Syntax Symposium.

Aleksandrowicz, O., Yamu, C. and van Nes, A., 2018. Spatio-Syntactical Analysis and

Historical Spatial Potentials: The Case of Jaffa–Tel Aviv. Journal of Interdisciplinary

History, 49(3), pp.445-472.

Atkinson, S., Fuller, S. and Painter, J., 2012. Wellbeing and place (pp. 1-14). Farnham:

Ashgate.

Brown, B.B., Perkins, D.D., 1992. Disruptions in place attachment. In: Altman, I., Low, S.M. (Eds.), Place Attachment. Plenum, New York.

Brown, G. and Fagerholm, N., 2015. Empirical PPGIS/PGIS mapping of ecosystem services: a review and evaluation. Ecosystem Services, 13, pp.119-133.

CATTELL, Vicky, DINES, Nick, GESLER, Wil, et al. Mingling, observing, and lingering:

Everyday public spaces and their implications for well-being and social relations. Health & place, 2008, vol. 14, no 3, p. 544-561.

Chapman, M.P., 1999. The Campus at the Millennium: A Plea for Community and

Place. Planning for Higher Education, 27(4), pp.25-31.

Chapman, M.P., 2006. American places: In search of the twenty-first century campus. Greenwood Publishing Group.

Conradson, D., 2012. Wellbeing: Reflections on geographical engagements. Wellbeing and place, pp.15-34.

Da Silva, l.c., Heitor, t.v. And Calvo-Sotelo, p.c., 2017. How exclusive do we want to be?Exploring the University Realm in the Contemporary Urban Territory. In Proceedings of the 11th International Space Syntax Symposium, Lisbon, iv-1–12. Retrieved from http://www.11ssslisbon.pt/docs/book-proceedings-29032018.pdf

DA SILVA, Luísa Cannas; HEITOR, Teresa Valsassina. Campuses as Sustainable Urban

Engines—A Morphological Approach to Campus Social Sustainability. In: Handbook of Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development in Higher Education. Springer International Publishing, 2017. p. 259-276.

den Heijer, A.C. and Magdaniel, F.T.C., 2018. Campus–City Relations: Past, Present, and Future. In Geographies of the University (pp. 439-459). Springer, Cham.

Dugdale, S., & Long, P. (2007). Planning the Informal Learning Landscape. ELI Webinar, 12.

Eyles, J. and Williams, A. eds., 2008. Sense of place, health and quality of life. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd..

Greene, M. and Penn, A., 1997. Socio-spatial analysis of four University Campuses: the implications of spatial configuration on creation and transmission of knowledge.

Goodchild, M.F., 2007. Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal, 69(4), pp.211-221.

Hillier, B., Penn, A., Hanson, J., Grajewski, T. and Xu, J., 1993. Natural movement: or,

configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement. Environment and Planning B: planning and design, 20(1), pp.29-66.

Hillier, B., Turner, A., Yang, T. and Park, H.T., 2009. Metric and topo-geometric properties of urban street networks: some convergences, divergences and new results. Journal of Space Syntax Studies.

Hummon, D. H., D. M.M. (1992) 'Community attachment: local sentiment and sense of palce', in Altman, I. & Low, S. M. (eds.) Place attachment. New York: Plenum Press.

Jacobs, Jane. The death and life of American cities. 1961

KARIMI, Kayvan. Space syntax: consolidation and transformation of an urban research field. 2018.

Legeby, A. (2013). Patterns of co-presence: Spatial configuration and social

segregation (Doctoral dissertation, KTH Royal Institute of Technology).

MAGDANIEL, Flavia Teresa de Jesús Curvelo. Technology campuses and cities: A study on the relation between innovation and the built environment at the urban area level. A+ BE| Architecture and the Built Environment, 2016, no 12, p. 1-476.

Marcus, L., Giusti, M. and Barthel, S., 2016. Cognitive affordances in sustainable urbanism: contributions of space syntax and spatial cognition. Journal of Urban Design, 21(4), pp.439- 452.

Pacione, M., 2003. Urban environmental quality and human wellbeing—a social geographicalperspective. Landscape and urban planning, 65(1-2), pp.19-30.

Pafka, E., Dovey, K. and Aschwanden, G.D., 2018. Limits of space syntax for urban design: Axiality, scale and sinuosity.

Poplin, A., Yamu, C. and Rico-Gutierrez, L., 2017. Place-making: an approach to rationale behind the location choice of power places. University campus Ames as a case study.

Ratti, C., 2004. Space syntax: some inconsistencies. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31(4), pp.487-499.

RELPH, Edward. Senses of place and emerging social and environmental challenges.

In: Sense of place, health and quality of life. Routledge, 2016. p. 51-64.

SHARMIN, Samia et KAMRUZZAMAN, Md. meta-analysis of the relationships between space syntax measures and pedestrian movement. Transport Reviews, 2018, vol. 38, no 4, p. 524-550.

Schewenius, M., Keränen, P. and al Rawaf, R., 2017. Dreams and Seeds: The role of campuses in sustainable urban development. Stockholm Resilience Centre och Metropolia University of Applied Sciences.

Vining, J. 2003. “The Connection to Other Animals and Caring for Nature.” Human Ecology Review 10: 87–99. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3802153.

Vining, J., M. S. Merrick, and E. A. Price. 2008. “The Distinction between Humans and

Nature: Human Perceptions of Connectedness to Nature and Elements of the Natural and Unnatural.” Human Ecology Review 15 (1): 1–11. http://biophiliccities.org/wp

content/uploads/2012/06/ DistinctionBetweenHumansNature.pdf.

Zillich, C., 2018. Coevolution of Town and Gown: The Heidelberg International Building Exhibition in Search of a Knowledge-based Urbanism for the Twenty-first Century. In Geographies of the University (pp. 461-475). Springer, Cham.

YAYLALI-YILDIZ, Berna, CZERKAUER-YAMU, Claudia, et ÇIL, Ela. Exploring the

effects of spatial and social segregation in university campuses, IZTECH as a case

study. Urban Design International, 2014, vol. 19, no 2, p. 125-143.

Varoudis, T. (2015), ‘DepthmapX – Multi-platform Spatial Network Analyses Software’. Avaiable at: <https://github.com//varoudis/depthmapX>.

World Health Organization. (1997). WHOQOL Measuring Quality of Life. Geneva: World Health Organisation.

Wu, x., Law, s., Heath, t. and Borsi, k., Spatial configuration shapes student social and

informal learning activities in educational complexes. In Proceedings of the 11th International Space Syntax Symposium, Lisbon, iv-1–12. Retrieved from

http://www.11ssslisbon.pt/docs/book-proceedings-29032018.pdf