JISCMail - SPACESYNTAX Archives

Hi Fanny,
I believe you have to run also the second step of the analysis (that is, both of them) to do the step-depth thing for angular and metrics, and tick the option to include metric distances. Can't remember right of the bat as I don't have Depthmap here with me but try that (before this step (afaik) Depthmap hasn't included any metric information in the database it actually does things on).
Generally speaking, however, there are some technicalities of running angular vs standard configurative analysis of multi-storey buildings in how it deals with the configurative step of a hyperlink (is it still called that?). A straight connection turns out as one step configuratively but 0 degrees in angular measurements. This is simply logical consequences of how a relates to b through the hyperlinked c and d. This leads to there being significant differences in how you need to prepare the model for depthmap analysis to have it say similar things (and correspond to empirically tested multi-story behaviour), and how the stairs / story shifts act in your model.
To sum it up: representing a stair as 1 syntactical step is less problematic than representing it as 0 angular steps. :)
(Technically, in principle:
the case: a sees c, c=d (hyperlink), d sees b
regular syntax: there is a configurative step to b; that a sees c does not mean it sees b;
angular syntax: if b is in the same direction from d as c is from a, there is no angular shift to b, i.e. the angular measure is = 0,
if b is in the opposite direction, you have the angular distance 1 (I can't guarantee it is exactly 1, but it is maximum angular difference).
That is, even if the specific points a and d, as well as c and b are connected without syntactical distance, a to b has a syntactical step between them.
This makes the different modes behave very differently around staircases, and the ways to get around it and/or add steps to represent a staircase also become differently easy as placing of link locations have different requirements.

Unless something has been changed in very recent models of Depthmap.)

Best
Daniel Koch

你好，Fanny，

       我相信你还必须运行分析的第二步，以对角度和米制距离进行步长深度，并勾选包含米制距离的选项。因为我身边没有Depthmap软件，记不太清了。但请尝试一下（在此步骤之前，Depthmap在它实际执行操作的数据库中没有包含任何度量信息）。

       然而，总的来说，多层建筑的角度和标准配置分析在如何处理超链接的配置步骤（仍称为超链接）方面存在一些技术问题。直线连接在结构上是一步，但在角度测量中是0度。这只是a如何通过超链接c和d与b关联的逻辑结果。这导致在如何为深度图分析准备模型以使其说出类似的事情（并对应于经经验测试的多层行为）以及楼梯/楼层移动如何在模型中起作用方面存在显著差异。

       总而言之：将楼梯表示为1个语法步骤比将其表示为0个角度步骤问题更小。

       案例：a看到c，c=d（超链接），d看到b

       常规语法：b有一个配置步骤；a看到c并不意味着它看到b；

       角度语法：如果b与d的方向相同，c与a的方向相同，则b没有角度偏移，即角度测量值为=0，

       如果b在相反的方向，角距离为1（我不能保证它正好为1，但它是最大角差）。

       也就是说，即使特定点a和d以及c和b在没有语法距离的情况下连接，a到b之间也有语法步长。

       这使得不同的模式在楼梯周围的行为非常不同，并且绕开楼梯和/或添加台阶来表示楼梯的方法也变得不同，因为放置连接位置有不同的要求。

       除非在最新的Depthmap模型中有所改变。

丹尼尔

On 2010-10-12 16:05, Fanny Goldsmith wrote:

[log in to unmask]" type="cite">

Hello:

 

Working in my research I was doing a Vga on a building.

To make it clear see enclosed Pdf file.

There are 2 plans on the same dxf file.

Each plan has two levels separated by 1.5 meters height.

The first pdf page has a local visibility analysis from the toilettes. You can see the visual step depth from that point on the plan.

The second page has a metric step shown only on one plan while doing analysis the second plan is coloured grey and the measure is 0.

 

Can anyone tell me why the analysis cannot perform a metric and angular analysis on every part of the file?

 

Page # 4 shows the visual step depth from another position on the building.

 

Thank you ver much in advance,

Fanny
--
Fanny Goldsmith-Architect
T. 972-9-9555381
F. 972-153-99555381
M:972-50-7510104
[log in to unmask]

你好：

在我的研究工作中，我在一栋大楼上做VGA分析。

为清楚说明，请参阅随附的Pdf文件。

同一dxf文件上有两个平面。

每个平面图有两层，高度为1.5米。

第一页pdf包含厕所的局部视域分析，从平面图上的该点可以看到视觉步深。

第二页仅在一个平面上显示了度量步骤。第二个平面为灰色，度量值为0。

有人能告诉我为什么分析不能对文件的每个部分执行米制距离和角度分析吗？

第4页显示了建筑物上另一个位置的视觉步深。

提前非常感谢你，

Fanny