ABSTRACT摘要 This paper aims to understand the relationship between spatial and socials features in Rio de Janeiro (Brazil), by comparing the city’s urban tissue with statistics data from the last national census (2010).本文旨在通过比较城市组织和上一次全国人口普查(2010)的统计数据,了解里约热内卢(巴西)的空间特征和社会特征之间的关系。 Founded in 1565, Rio de Janeiro is the second biggest Brazilian city and one of the most emblematic sites concerning its urban and social landscapes. In terms of space, Rio results from different patterns of urban grids, shaped by different geographical, historical and social features.里约热内卢始建于1565年,是巴西第二大城市,也是其城市和社会景观最具代表性的景点之一。在空间上,里约热内卢源于不同的地理、历史和社会特征所形成的不同的城市网格模式。 Space Syntax techniques were chosen to support the comprehension of the urban tissue and how it affects the social urban dynamics. A detailed axial map, including all favelas, was developed, and then compared with data about population, jobs, and income by neighbourhood.选择空间句法技术来支持对城市组织及其如何影响社会城市动态的理解。绘制了一张详细的轴向图,包括所有的贫民窟,然后按社区与人口、工作和收入数据进行比较。 Results have shown that, socially, the city has a strong segregation of inhabitants, income and jobs distribution, and the space seems to play an import role in such performance.结果表明,从社会层面看,城市居民、收入和工作分配存在较强的隔离,空间在这一表现中发挥着重要作用。 The spatial fragmentation of the urban tissue has a close relation to the social segregation in Rio de Janeiro. The configuration of the city shows that the integration potential of the urban shape is not well used and the main investments in infrastructure are made in some restricted areas.城市组织的空间碎片化与里约热内卢的社会隔离有着密切的关系。从城市组构上看,城市形态的整合潜力没有得到很好的利用,基础设施投资主要集中在一些限制性地区。 The research also reveals that the existence of favelas is not an aggravating factor of the global segregation in Rio. When compared to the other urban areas, favelas have a similar performance, which can suggest a necessity of a distinguished approach in the urban policies.研究还表明,贫民窟的存在并不是里约热内卢全球种族隔离加剧的因素。同其他城市地区相比,贫民窟的表现是相似的,这可以表明在城市政策方面必须采取一种独特的办法。
2021-01-05REFERENCES参考文献 Architectural design dataset (the third edition), 2017, Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press,Vol.1 pp. 9Batty, M., (2001), “Exploring isovist fields: space and shape in architectural and urban morphology”,Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28, 123-150Benedikt, M., (1979), “To take hold of space: isovist and isovist field”, Environment and Planning B,6, 47-65Cooper, J., Oskrochi, R., (2008), “Fractal analysis of street vistas: a potential tool for assessing levels of visual variety in everyday street scenes”, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 35,349-363Ding, W., (2011), “Mapping Urban Spaces: Moving Image as a Research Tool”, in F. Penz and A. Lu(eds), Urban Cinematics: Understanding Urban Phenomena through the Moving Images, Chicago:Intelrlect Press, pp. 315-355.Fisher-Gewirtzman, D. and Wagner A, I., (2003), “Spatial openness as a practical metric for evaluating built-up environments”, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 30, 37-49Fisher-Gewirtzman, D., Burt, M. and Tzamir, Y., (2003), “A 3-D visual method for comparative evaluation of dense built-up environments”, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 30,575-587Fisher-Gewirtzman, D., Pinsly, D. S., Wagner A, I. and Burt, M., (2005), “View-oriented three-dimensional visual analysis models for the urban environment”, URBAN DESIGN International, 10,23-37Jon, M., (2004), Study on the evaluation method of the settlement of quantification of a vision, Ph.DDissertation, Tokyo: Waseda UniversityLiu, T., (2011), Vectoring the street spatial outline from streetscape moving images, MasterDissertation, Nanjing: Nanjing UniversityPeripheral vision, [online] Available at <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peripheral_vision> (18/08/201800:59)Porta, S., and Renne, J.L., (2005), “linking urban design to sustainability: formal indicators of social urban sustainability field research in Perth, Western Australia”, URBAN DESIGN International, 10,51-64Tilley, A. R. and Henry Dreyfuss Associates, (2008) The measure of man & woman: human factors in design (revised edition), Tianjin: Tianjin University Press, pp. 11-14, 24Turner, A., Doxa, M., O’Sullivan, D. and Penn, A., (2001), “From isovists to visibility graphs: a methodology for the analysis of architectural space”, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28, 103-121Yang, P. P-J., Putra, S. Y. and Li, W., (2007), “Viewsphere: a GIS-based 3D visibility analysis for urban design evaluation”, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 34, 971-992Yang, P. P-J., Putra, S. Y. and Chaerani, M., (2007), “Computing the sense of time in urban physical environment”, URBAN DESIGN International, 12, 115-129Zhang, Y. and Cui, Y., (2002), “The basic conception of architectural spatial form system”,Architectural Journal, 9, 55-57
2021-01-05